- I want to find out how much fuel our family uses in an average week
- I think the website "Pain at the Pump" will come in handy
- My husband and I need to track our miles driven every day for a week, and figure out how much fuel we burned in those miles and how many dollars were spent as well.
- To collect this data we will both fuel up at the same time and then again at the same time a week later.
- On the first fuel up, we will zero out the odometers to track our mileage, and on the second fuel up a week later we will be able to use miles driven and gallons purchased to see exactly how much fuel we used.
- Then we will have to ponder the essential question of "How can we conserve our fuel usage?"
- Perhaps...eventually I could get a daycare provider who is not 5 miles out of town, and I can certainly walk home and back to work on my breaks.
- If I make the grocery store deliver my goods is that fuel conservation? I'll use less anyway...
- If I drove my piece o' crap car into the ocean I would save a great deal on fuel.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Saturday, September 22, 2007
- The new Superintendent addressed the issue of technology in our first inservice day.
- He would like to see every high school student with their own, school-provided, lap top computer.
- The ed tech plan is gigantic and thorough in it's approach on technology.
- The school district maintains that technology should be used from K-12, and the tech plan describes how it should be used at each grade level
The two elements of the ed tech plan and the first inservice with the new superintendent are somewhat contradictory when juxtaposed with the immediate reality of day to day life in the school.
- Money for technological tools does not seem to be exactly bountiful. (Our cup doth not overflow).
- The optimism of the new Superintendent makes me feel hopeful that this may change.
- Many teachers seem resistant to learn or use technology in their education plans.
- The teachers with positive attitudes toward technology use have "snatched" up the available tools and kind of "hog 'em all up."
I would like to try to push for more technology integration in the classes that I'm teaching. I have a few ideas about how to possibly achieve this goal.
- Perhaps schmoozing the techno-pigs with cookies will earn me a few hours of use with the precious presentation tools.
- Mafia style tactics might work better.
- Encourage my host teachers to join my gang (make them feel sorry for me that the university is making me put so much emphasis on technology and play up the need to meet the requirements to graduate the MAT program).
- (Hey, it's working with the implementation of more "cooperative learning" activities)
- If/when I do succeed in employing technology in my lessons, do a damn good job so that the teachers may develop a more positive outlook and attitude of intrigue toward technology.
Saturday, September 01, 2007
Jamie Townsend
townsend@gci.net
9-2-07
1.) Teachers need to be taught not only HOW to use computers, but how to use them to increase student learning.
2.) Districts need to increase instructional programs, appropriate hardware and software programs, adequate time for lessons, and increase technological support and leadership.
3.) Technology is used primarily in schools to present information collected rather than to delve more deeply into scholarly material and academic skills. Electronic Presentation was the most frequently used application (81%) in a poll that spanned from 1999 to 2003.
4.) Spreadsheets were only used 6% of the time, a tool which Burns insists promotes analytical and critical thinking skills when used as more than "show and tell" organization
5.) NCLB has been cited as one major reason that data-management has taken precedent over instruction in the realm of technology.
Reflection
This article was the most difficult of all for me to get through. I've spent a ridiculous amount of time trying to figure out why, and I still don't have a very good argument. I don't know if it was the writer's voice, or all of the examples of technology that I really don't understand that made this such a dense read for me. Likely it was a combination of the two. Prensky's article irritated me enough to keep my interest, and I highly enjoyed Richardson, but Burn's writing was almost painful for me to read. I do, however, appreciate her position, and I believe she addresses a crucial topic. Maybe I also find it overwhelming because I still need to learn so much of the technology before I can begin learning how to best implement the technology. Wait a minute! Maybe that's what THIS CLASS if for! Eureka!
Jamie Townsend
townsend@gci.net
9/1/07